The look says it all. 


President Obama was joined by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown (center) and French President Nicolas Sarkozy. (Jim Young/Reuters)

Obama has been ordered to attack Iran -- or else Israel will.

And note the order: U.S., Britain, France -- as if they all fell in by rank.

No wonder they enabled the Rwandan genocide.

"Obama win spurs equality manifesto; Leading figures in France urge end to racism" by Angela Charlton, Associated Press  |  November 12, 2008

PARIS - Inspired by Barack Obama, the French president's wife and other leading figures say it's high time for France to stamp out racism and shake up a white political and social elite that smacks of colonial times....

Or a New World Order.

The manifesto was written by Yazid Sabeg, a French self-made millionaire whose parents were Algerian immigrants, and signed by politicians from the left and right and other public figures.  Obama is extremely popular in France, yet blacks and other minorities are nearly invisible in national or local politics here. The lower house of Parliament has 555 members from the French mainland; just one is black.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has suggested affirmative action for France, but later backed away from the idea since it goes against France's ideals of egalitarianism, which dictate that the country not classify its citizens according to race. This idea that everyone is just "French" means there are no census or other national figures calculating how big the country's minority groups are.

The manifesto urges term limits to make way for more minority candidates, and presses the government to improve schools in working-class neighborhoods. That appears to be a reference to housing projects heavily populated by nonwhite immigrants and their families, areas that erupted in riots in 2005 by disenfranchised youth, many of them Arab and black children of immigrants. --more--" 

I LIKE the IDEA very much!  Maybe they could DUMP some of the New World Order types like Nico here!!!!

The French are doing this out of revenge for having been caught committing war crimes. Typical tactic: when caught in a crime, start hollering about that guy over there being worse.

"Official's arrest spurs Rwandan anger

KIGALI, Rwanda - Thousands protested in Rwanda's capital yesterday over Germany's arrest of a senior official wanted by France in connection with the presidential assassination that preceded the African nation's 1994 genocide.

Rose Kabuye, chief of protocol for Rwandan President Paul Kagame, was arrested at an airport in Frankfurt on Sunday because France wants to question her about the 1994 plane crash that killed then-president Juvenal Habyarimana. The assassination led to 100 days of genocide that killed more than a half million Rwandan Tutsis and moderate Hutus.

I'm wondering which western intelligence organization she was working for.

Rwanda's Tutsi-led government and genocide survivor groups have accused France of training and arming the Hutu militias and former government troops who led the genocide. A French judge issued warrants in 2006 for nine associates of Kagame, including Kabuye, over the crash, contributing to strained ties between the countries. All nine are in Kagame's government.

French authorities are investigating Kabuye for complicity to murder because she is suspected of having housed the commando unit blamed for the attack on Rwanda's presidential plane before it was downed. Kabuye's lawyer, Lef Forster, said his client denied involvement in the April 1994 attack.

Hutu extremists accused Tutsi rebels of shooting down the plane. The rebels say Hutu extremists carried out the assassination themselves to provide a pretext for the slaughter. --more--"

Or a western intelligence agency could have been responsible.

I thought this might be a good companion piece, readers:

"France's role in the Rwandan genocide" by Stephen Kinzer | August 14, 2008

Stephen Kinzer is author of "A Thousand Hills: Rwanda's Rebirth and the Man Who Dreamed It."

IS THE defendant's dock at the International Criminal Court reserved for leaders of small and poor countries that defy the West? Not if Rwanda has its way. It wants to charge some of France's most celebrated leaders of the 1990s as collaborators in genocide.

Last week the government of Rwanda issued a damning 500-page report documenting France's participation in the 1994 Rwandan genocide. This marks a remarkable turnaround in the deeply politicized world of human rights reporting. Usually, such reporting takes the form of governments or human rights groups based in the West condemning poor countries for having political or social systems that do not meet Western standards. Now a wretched African country has turned the table.

All who study the Rwandan genocide, as I did while researching a book about that ill-fated country, come away stunned by what they learn about French support of mass murder. France was so eager to defend a client regime against English-speaking rebels that, as the new report asserts, it gave that regime "political, military, diplomatic and logistic support" and "directly assisted" its genocidal campaign.

The report names 33 present and former French politicians and military officers as conspirators, among them the late President Francois Mitterrand and other well-known figures like former foreign minister Alan Juppe and former prime minister Dominique de Villepin.

The report, commissioned by the government and prepared by a panel that heard from more than 150 witnesses, is not only a devastating account of France's eager participation in mass murder. It is also the most provocative example in modern history of a victimized nation pointing a credible finger of blame at the supposedly virtuous West.

France armed Rwanda's murderous regime, sent soldiers to support it as the genocide was unfolding, and accepted some of its most heinous perpetrators as "refugees" after rebels forced them from power.

Gee, the Zionist-controlled, agenda-pushing, obfuscating, and distorting AmeriKan MSM sure kept a lid on that -- AS IT WAS HAPPENING (read on).

Later, France helped the genocidaires regroup in the Congo and launch a savage cross-border campaign aimed at retaking power so they could complete their murderous work.

And notice how the HOLOCAUST in the CONGO goes COMPLETELY UNMENTIONED by the Zionist press.

That's because the #s are MORE than the Holohoax™.

Please see: The War that did not make the Headlines: Over Five Million Dead in Congo?

Even as the genocide was unfolding, reports of France's support for it began appearing in French newspapers. French soldiers who arrived in Rwanda believing that they had come to protect victims soon realized that they were, in fact, protecting killers, and several communicated their disgust to French journalists....

So it was KNOWN AT THE TIME, folks!!!!

And the reactions of the French soldiers is emblematic of the U.S. soldier in Iraq and the current epidemic of troop suicides.

No one likes being a Nazi -- no one with a soul, that is.

A spokesman for the French foreign ministry rejected the Rwandan report as "unacceptable."

HOLOCAUST DENIER!!! HOLOCAUST DENIER!!!!!!!!!!

That was a mistake. The report should be an occasion for French leaders to reflect on their country's history in ways Western nations seldom do. Perhaps they could even break with the longstanding pattern of denial that has shaped so much of modern history.

Oh, man, tell me about it! All those lies I was taught in school and that we are forced to live with everyday!

Thanks to author Mike Whitney's research, we now know:

"In researching the Bush administration’s manipulation of public perceptions, I came across an interesting summary of the State Department’s Philip Zelikow, who was Executive Director on the 9-11 Commission, that greatest of all charades. According to Wikipedia:

"Prof. Zelikow’s area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, 'public myths’ or 'public presumptions’ which he defines as 'beliefs (1) thought to be true ( although not necessarily known with certainty) and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community.’ In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called 'searing’ or 'molding’ events (that) take on transcendent’ importance and therefore retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene….He has noted that 'a history’s narrative power is typically linked to how readers relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot make the connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage them at all." ("Thinking about Political History" Miller center Report, winter 1999, p 5-7)

Isn’t that the same as saying there is neither history nor truth; that what is really important is the manipulation of epochal events so they serve the interests of society’s managers? Thus, it follows that if the government can create their own "galvanizing events", then they can write history any way they choose.

If that’s the case, then perhaps the entire war on terror is cut from whole cloth; a garish public relations maneuver devoid of meaning."

You think?

Like all countries, France is built on national myths.

Didn't I just make that point?

If it can admit the evil that has pervaded its role in Africa, perhaps other countries could follow by confronting the sins of their past.

Like AmeriKa? I wouldn't wait around! Not this "exceptional" nation!

That would be an admission that people who, in Joseph Conrad's words, "have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves" are not the only ones guilty of the 20th century's great crimes."

Nope!

And the 21st century looks like it will belong to USrael!!!!!!

You may think I'm going to go over the false WMD, the false uranium charge, the false terrorist ties, Chalabi's group, the prison abuse, and the lack of reconstruction.

That's not what I'm going to do; I'm going to focus on the LIES of SEVERAL GOVERNMENTS that we were told were AGAINST the invasion of Iraq.

The information has been culled from New York Times papers I purchased.

The relevant dates are all from 2006, dated February 27, March 2, 3, 12, and 27:

First is a report that German Intel gave the U.S. the Iraqi defense plan a month before the invasion. The Germans "offered more significant assistance to the US than their government has publicly acknowledged... and... is not the only instance in which nations that publicly cautioned against the war privately facilitated it. Egypt and Saudi Arabia... provided more help than they have disclosed."

The article details that that after the Germans passed along the intel, and "when the bombs started falling, the agents ceased operations, and went to the French embassy."

That's the French who were damn near our enemies for being "against" us on this, right? Most of the article is German government disassembling and backtracking as "accounts of German assistance differs from the one the German government has provided publicly."

German ships also provided operational assistance in some areas. This was designated by the U.S. as "noncoalition but cooperating."

Later, it was exposed that a top level German officer was stationed in Tommy Franks' office!

That the Germans "provided information on Iraqi police and military units... coordinates... of military forces... but... they did not facilitate airstrikes" against Iraq.

Germany continues the cover-up: like the government liars they are, deny, deny, deny your culpability for "Shock and Awe" slaughter.

Turns out that there was "an interesting sidelight... the two German intelligence agents... would take refuge in the French embassy. They did exactly that... giving the French, who also vociferously opposed the... war in Iraq, an indirect role in supporting" the German-American operation.

Hey, with enemies like these, who needs friends? The news analysis actually asks what the big deal is.

Like governments LYING to the PUBLIC is NO PROBLEM!

Not the only case, however. Egypt "publicly... insisted that Egypt would not provide direct help to the U.S.... but quietly allowed U.S. aerial refueling tankers to be based," in Egypt, as well as giving them overflight permission.

Saudi Arabia "played down the extent of their cooperation... but they allowed the Delta Force and other American Special Operations Forces to mount attacks in Iraq from a secret base... the public Saudi explanation was that the area was being cordoned off for a potential flood of Iraqi refugees."

The U.S. described these actions as those of "silent partners."

Then there is the multitude of U.S. LIES, with the focus on the March 12 adaptation in the Times from "Cobra II" by Mike Gordon.

Apparently, Saddam was "so preoccupied about the threat from within... he crippled his military in fighting the threat from without."

I remember Gen. T. Michael Moseley saying that the shooting at the no-fly zone patrols was a 'chicken-or-the-egg' thing.

He said that in July 2002 (to soften up Iraq), the U.S. stepped up bombing raids, which inspired Iraqis to fire their air defenses.

According to Moseley, the question was: "Is he firing more because we are flying more?"

It is important to remember that the "imminent" threat. the "grave and gathering danger" NEVER SHOT DOWN a SINGLE PATROLLING AIR CRAFT in more than 12 YEARS of a no-fly zone.

NOT ONE!!!!

Anyhow, Saddam told his commanders THREE MONTHS BEFORE the war they had no WMD!

He was more worried about internal coups and revolts than the U.S. invasion, and viewed Iran as a serious threat.

How does Gordon know this?

Because 11o Iraqis were interrogated "some to lavish dinners to pry loose their secrets and questioning others in a detention center at the Baghdad airport or the Abu Ghraib prison."

I wonder who the LUCKY Iraqis were -- and the ones who weren't so lucky, who were "questioned" at Abu Ghraib.

As for Iran, Hussein's military "conducted an exercise code-named Golden Falcon that focused on defense of the Iraq-Iran border."

I can't believe we got rid of this guy!

FIGHTS Iran and "Al-CIA-Duh" for us, and we STAB HIM in the BACK!

He even took steps to AVOID WAR!

Saddam "rejected proposals to mine the Persian Gulf, fearing... such an action," as an excuse for America to strike.

He ordered that U.N. inspectors "be given the access they wanted and... ordered a crash effort to scrub the country" so there would be no trace of any banned weapons.

That behavior, HIS COMPLIANCE WITH UN RESOLUTIONS, actually led to his downfall!!!

The very same actions "were viewed by the Americans as efforts to hide the weapons," and those actions "the Iraqi government was taking to reduce the prospect of war were used against it."

Yup, by this LYING, MURDERING, WAR CRIMINAL ADMINISTRATION!!

TELLING LIES to LEAD us to WAR!!!!!

MASS-MURDERING CRIMINALS!!!!!!!!

And POOR Saddam, huh?

Can't win for losing, could you Saddam (peace be upon you)?

And how about your friends, the Russians?

They were protecting you by giving you false information "raising the possibility that it might have been part of a deliberate American effort to fool" the Iraqis with a "disinformation campaign."

NO!!!

America would NEVER do something like that, engage in a campaign of DECEIT and DECEPTION!

That NEVER, EVER happened in the past, and the stink-fuck American government WOULD NEVER LIE US into war, oh no!

Then there is the BOMBSHELL! Bigger than the Downing Street Memo!

Their existence was announced by the New York Times on March 27. 2006, and they are affectionately known as the Sands Memos.

They detail a January 2003 meeting between Bliar and Bush that puts the lie to all the diplomatic posturing -- and exposes an even more NEFARIOUS and SINISTER side of the actions our governments have taken to lead us to war.

After reading this, please tell me again how 9/11 could not possibly or conceivably be an inside job.

According to Sands, Bush was "determined to invade Iraq... even if arms inspectors failed to find unconventional weapons... the start date... was penciled in for 10 March."

Both leaders knew no weapons had been found, or would likely be, so "Bush talked about several ways to provoke a confrontation, including a proposal to paint a US surveillance plane in the colors of the UN in hopes of drawing fire, or assassinating Mr. Hussein."

So there it is!

Discussion of a real-live, honest-to-goodness FALSE-FLAG OPERATION!

Oh, and the assassination talk, um, George, that's a violation of law. Add another WAR CRIME CHARGE to the IMPEACHMENT LEDGER!!!

As for a second UN resolution, the US would "twist arms and even threaten."

Or SPY on MEMBER STATES, according to the brave British civil servant Katherine Gun.

And how did Bush and Bliar think the war would go?

They were "supremely confident... envisioned a quick victory... Bush predicted that it was 'unlikely there would be internecine warfare,' " and Bliar agreed.

Blair asked about post-invasion planning and "Condi Rice said that a great deal of work was now in hand... Bush said that a great deal of detailed planning had been done on supplying the Iraqi people with food and medicine."

Yup, a FAILURE as always!

Oh, how this DIPS*** has HURT OUR COUNTRY!!

Buried deep in the middle of the piece is an incredible acknowledgment by Bliar.

Bliar wanted the second UN resolution "because it would serve as an 'insurance policy against the unexpected' if anything went wrong with the military campaign... [it] would give us international cover, especially with the Arabs."

Do you comprehend the significance of the statement, reader?

When Bliar talks about an "insurance policy against the unexpected' if anything went wrong with the military campaign," he recognizes that what he and Bush initiated is a WAR CRIME!!!

When Bliar is concerned about the military campaign and "unexpected" events, he is concerned about the fact that THEY MAY LOSE!

ONLY LOSERS ARE PUNISHED FOR WAR CRIMES!! WINNERS NEVER ARE!!!

Despite their "supreme confidence" and certainty in their case and cause, these guys were AWARE that they were COMMITTING a WAR CRIME by invading Iraq.

And now it's exponential. Bush guilty of High Crimes and Treason!!

We've used Depleted Uranium weapons in Iraq, and we've dropped chemical weapons on Fallujah.

The list of crimes against humanity that George W. Bush has committed GROWS by the DAY!

Given the unending streams of LIES and OBFUSCATIONS from this administration, reader, is it pure fantastical conjecture that these cretinous criminals not only allowed 9/11 to occur, but that they actually made it happen?

Is it so far beyond the realm of thought now?

Is it?

(Updated version; Originally published October 7, 2006)