Seven years ago:
That 19 Arab operatives, at the direction of Osama bin Laden, the leader of the radical Islamic terror network Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, pierced the United States aerial surveillance net on September 11, 2001, ramming three hijacked airliners into two World Trade Center Towers and the Pentagon. That a fourth airliner was brought to the ground by heroic passengers in western Pennsylvania. That fire melted the steel in the towers, causing them to collapse. That fire was responsible for WTC 7 collapsing at 5:25 pm that same day. That surprise and luck were responsible for the collapse of the U.S. air defense system on 9/11.
World Trade Center 1: The North Tower, the first one hit by American Airlines Flight 11. Hijacked around 8:21 am, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notified the North Eastern Air Defense Sector (NEADS) that Flight 11 had been hijacked. The response from NEADS was "Is this real-world or exercise?" (this refers to several war game exercises that the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) was conducting that morning) At 8:46 am, Flight 11 cruised into WTC 1 between the 94th and 98th floors. According to the only known footage of the event, the Naudet brothers, the plane looks oddly steady as it plows into WTC 1. It is my belief that this is a remote-controlled aircraft with passengers either dead from asphyxiation or no passengers at all (per the Operation Northwoods documents of 1962). At 10:28, the North Tower collapses straight down, sending a cloud of toxic dust and debris through the streets of lower Manhattan. The symmetry of the collapse, and residue of fine dust and particles, suggest a controlled demolition, seconds after the tv antenna began to fall. Physical science dictates that the top piece should have fallen over; the building should not have fallen at free-fall speed! Sulfur was detected in what few debris samples were collected, suggesting the use of the powerful explosive Thermate. Additionally, witnesses like Mike Pecoraro, who was working in the basement when the attack happened, reported explosions in a machine shop and parking garage, while others, like janitor Willie Rodriguez, (covered by mainstream media reports) report explosions before the collapse.
World Trade Center 2: The South Tower, the second structure struck by United Airlines Flight 175. Hijacked 8:42 am, passengers allegedly began making telephone calls from the flight; however, there are no billing or recording evidence to back up these claims (it is nearly impossible to make mobile phone calls above 8,000 feet). At 9:01, the New York FAA center manager notes that "We have several situations going on here. It's escalating big, big time. We need to get the military involved in this... We're involved with something else, we have other aircraft that may have a similar situation going on here." Two minutes later, at 9:03 am, a horrified nation watched on television as Flight 175 slammed into the corner of the South Tower between floors 78 and 84. A huge fireball erupted into the air (burning off most of the jet fuel). This plane looked more out of control; however, a Fox News reporter stated that he saw the plane go by and that he saw no windows. The trajectory was unusual, as if the plane were remote-controlled (and Griffiss Air Force Base in Rome, NY, is a home of remote-controlled Predator drones and would be a perfect site for a Northwoods switch). At 9:59, as the upper half of the building began to tip (the second of the buildings hit), explosions occur and panicked citizens try to outrun the poisonous debris cloud as the South Tower drops into its own footprint, much like the North Tower will do 29 minutes later.
World Trade Center 7: Not hit by an airplane, this 47-story building surprised everyone by coming straight down at 5:20 the afternoon of September 11, 2001. Owner Larry Silverstein, who profited greatly from the destruction wrought by the attacks, ridding himself of an environmental calamity (the WTC sites needed an overhaul due to asbestos and other hazardous chemicals used in construction) and pulling away $7 billion in insurance payments, was now-famously quoted in a PBS special that "[The Fire Department] were not sure that they were gonna be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, we've had such a terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. They made the decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." Pull is the industry term for controlled demolition. Very useful, since the building housed the US Secret Service, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission. and the Mayor of New York's Office of Emergency Management (where I believe the planes were guided by beacons and the detonation buttons were pushed for Towers 1 and 2), along with the headquarters of Saloman Brothers merchant bank. All the records of these offices were destroyed.
Summary of Site: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have no explanation for the collapses (simulated experiments failed), yet stand by the impossible fire explanation. Despite the fact that never before or since has a steel-framed building collapsed due to fire. A blazing inferno at the Interstate Bank Building in Los Angeles on May 4th, 1988 gutted four floors, yet the 62-story building stood. On February 12th, 2005, a 32-story steel-framed tower in Madrid, Spain was engulfed in flames for days. Some top stories collapsed; however, the rest of the tower stood. And if the fires were so hot, how could a woman be caught on news footage waving fron the impact hole in the North Tower? Why was molten steel observed in the wreckage of the towers, and hot zones higher than the temperature of jet fuel detected days after the event (after rain and fire hoses had been sprayed on the rubble pile)? The only answer is controlled demolitions. That would explain why the crime scene was quickly cleaned up, forensic evidence destroyed, and the rubbled steel sent to China to be melted down. After all, weeks before 9/11 security drills were run almost daily. The week before 9/11 they ceased, and the weekend before the 9/11 attacks, all power was shut down to allegedly install computer cables, shutting down all security cameras and alarms for over 30 hours and allowing unknown workmen into the buildings. And Marvin Bush, president Bush's brother, just so happened to be head of security for the WTC at the time. And as all the videos show, there is the undeniable "squib" ejections so consistent with controlled demolitions.
Pentagon: At 9:37 (although author Barbara Honneger details extensively that at 9:32 either bombs inside the Pentagon, or in a truck parked outside, went off) the Pentagon was allegedly struck by the mysterious American Airlines Flight 77. This is where I break from Mike Rivero, since I in fact believe the video and documentary evidence show a cruise missile strike from some type of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). It would have the proper homing beacon to get through the Pentagon's defense system. The five frames of security footage shows no airliner (nor could the alleged pilot, Hani Hanjour, have executed such a daring move), while the round whole and burn pattern have the marks of a missile strike, with UAV wreckage in the rubble. A flashing fireball is in the video, and yet books and other objects are clearly visible in photos after the strike. And Barbara Olson, wife of US Solicitor-General Ted Olson, was the only person to phone from the flight (which she could not have)? Video cameras from the gas station were released showing nothing, while the Sheraton hotels video (taken by FBI agents as horrified employees watched over and over again) have remained hidden. And if the Pentagon's security cameras corroborated the government's story, we would have seen them by now.
However, regardless of what hit the Pentagon, the fact is that nothing should have made it through the defense screen of the most heavily-defending building on the planet. Only military planes with the proper transponders can break through the Pentagon's radar grid without being fired upon. And even if it was AA Flight 77, there is no way the alleged pilot Hanjour could have executed the difficult ramming maneuver, lending more credence the the remote-controlled aircraft theory. Don't get distracted from the NORAD stand down.
Pennsylvania: United Airlines Flight 93, hijacked at 9:28 am, allegedly crashed in western Pennsylvania. Flight 93 was the cultural myth and rallying cry that puffed up American pride in the wake of the tragedy. Todd Beamer's alleged "Let's Roll" comment on retaking the cockpit from the hijackers was later used as the war cry to invade Afghanistan by President Bush. Only problem is Beamer's call-- and all the others-- could not have taken place! The altitude prohibited it! Reports are that one person that called said, "They're doing it! They're doing it," as the passengers began to gain access to the cockpit. Then a bang was heard, a rush of wind, then silence. The debris field in western Pennsylvania seems to confirm a shoot down, as plane debris was scattered over an 8-mile radius, and the county coroner announced that there was hardly any blood to find, never mind body parts. Flight 93's flight path and actual fate are also shrouded in mystery (one airport reported that Flight 93 had landed with the passengers all safe). Then there is the video. Either way, hero story or no, this plane was shot down. There simply could not be any live witnesses left to testify on what might have really happened. That is the nature of cover-story operations.
Summary: The conduct of NORAD begs questions here. After 67 successful intercepts in the previous year (with not one failure), NORAD fails four times-- not once, four times-- on the morning of 9/11. How? Why? Remember the case of Payne Stewart, the golfer whose Learjet went off course? The Air Force intercepted him within 20 minutes and followed the plane until it crashed into a mountainside in the Dakotas. Was NORAD told to stand down? Or were they just confused because of the war games exercises? Either way, the result was the same.
Patsies: Within an hour, the national media reported that government sources indicated that it was radical Islamists, directed by the mysterious Osama bin Laden, who were responsible for the attacks. Photographs of the alleged suspects were made available, and evidence was supposedly left behind and collected implicating an Egyptian named Mohamed Atta as the ringleader of the group. Problems soon developed with the cover story, however. The British Broadcasting Corporation reported that 6 of the hijackers were still alive and living in various Middle Eastern countries, and reports in America emerged that the pious Muslim operatives behaved as anything but, frequenting bars and strip parlors (a common occurrence regarding patsies involved in western-intel, false-flag events). Even more sinister was the Pentagon's handling and monitoring of the patsies through Operation Able Danger.
Able Danger was the unclassified name given to a program launched in 1999 by US Special Operations Command as an effort to track Al Qaeda and other terror groups. Military analysts created charts with pictures of Al Qaeda operatives whose identities were known. One of the charts depicted Atta and his ties to an Al Qaeda cell, as well as identifying other hijackers. That's the way it works. You supervise your patsies, you don't bust them. That's why FBI officials blocked investigations and discarded reports from field officers like John O'Neill, Robert Wright, Ken Williams, Coleen Rowley, and Sibel Edmonds (who claims that the money trail has been covered up because it leads to certain political campaigns. That would likely be Saudi funding of the alleged hijackers, while the Bush Administration worked the other side through its connections to lobbyist Jack Abramoff -- who hosted Atta on one of his casino boats several months before the attacks). Additionally, the 9/11 Commission stated that the financing of the hijackers was unimportant. Of course, the Commission ignored the fact that Mahmoud Ahmed, head of Pakistan’s ISI, had Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh wire $100,000 to Atta, or that Ahmed had breakfast with Joe Biden (of all people) on the morning of 9/11.
Bush: The guy lied about events. Says he saw the first plane hit, but decided to go ahead with a children's reading at a Florida school anyway. While reading with the children, Chief-of-Staff Andy Card walks over and whispers to Bush that a second plane has struck the WTC complex. Bush remains unemotional, and continues with the children for approximately another 30 minutes. This proves that 9/11 was an inside job. The Secret Service had to have known Bush was not a target of surprise attacks. Otherwise, they would have (and should have) hustled Bush out of there right away. Ever since the removal of security for JFK, the Secret Service takes protection very seriously. JFK, nor any president, should ever be killed or assassinated; that is again more evidence of an inside job. Remember how quickly they got Reagan in the limo in 1981?
Cheney: The crux of the case. After the first attack and just before the second, Cheney was allegedly rushed to the president's nuclear-bombproof emergency operations center (PEOC) in the basement of the White House. My belief is he was already there. Cheney was in charge and directing several war games on 9/11. These games served to confuse the FAA and NORAD, allowing the real attacks to get through. Perhaps the most damning testimony comes from former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, who testified to the 9/11 Commission that he arrived at the PEOC at 9:20 a.m., recalled:
"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out' 'The plane is 30 miles out' And when it got down to 'the plane is 10 miles out,' the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand! Have you heard anything to the contrary?' Well at the time, I didn't know what all that meant. This was the flight that came into the Pentagon."
What could those orders have been, other than stand down orders? There were drills going, so the stand down order fits nicely: All the blips and scenarios are not real; therefore, no response is needed for the actual attacks that unknowingly slip through NORAD's defense screen. In May 2001, by presidential order, Cheney was given direct control over all wargame and drill exercises.
Wargames: Among the exercises being conducted that day: Operation Northern Vigilance, which sent jet fighters north to the Arctic to intercept fictitious Russian planes; Operation Tripod II, which had FEMA in New York City on the evening of September the 10th, and was to simulate a biowarfare exercise for September 12th; Operation Vigilant Guardian, which simulated hijacked aircraft carrying out the exact same scenario as what actually occurred on 9/11. NORAD'S control officer who oversaw the exercise, Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, responded to a call about a hijacked aircraft from the Boston Center by saying, "It must be part of the exercise," another example of how the numerous drills deliberately distracted NORAD so that the real planes could not be intercepted; Operation Northern Guardian, which is still opaque, yet is believed to be a component of Operation Vigilant Guardian; and Operation Vigilant Warrior, thought to be the attack piece of Operation Vigilant Guardian.
Whitewash: The 9/11 Commission, this generation's Warren Report. More accurately described as the Kean-Zelikow report, named after Chairman Tom Kean and Executive Director Phillip Zelikow, a Bush Administration official. The administration and Zelikow decided which documents the Commission would see, and what evidence they would not.
According to Wikipedia:
"Prof. Zelikow’s area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, 'public myths’ or 'public presumptions’ which he defines as 'beliefs (1) thought to be true ( although not necessarily known with certainty) and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community.’ In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called 'searing’ or 'molding’ events (that) take on transcendent’ importance and therefore retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene….He has noted that 'a history’s narrative power is typically linked to how readers relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot make the connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage them at all." ("Thinking about Political History" Miller center Report, winter 1999, p 5-7)
As Zelikow presciently implies, the post 9-11 world depends entirely on "public myths"; fairy tales invented by society’s supervisors which perpetuate the illusion of democracy, freedom and the rule of law. Zelikow is also the author of the US' National Security Strategy of 2002, and once stated that the war on Iraq was about Israeli, not American, interests.
The Israelis: Among the more under-covered aspects is Israel's role in all this. From the five dancing Israelis working for a dummy moving company that filmed the WTC events from New Jersey that exclaimed to one witness that "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem," to the Larry Franklin spy ring at the Pentagon, to the Odigo corporation (located at the WTC complexes) warning its workers to stay home on 9/11, to Fox News' Carl Cameron, of all people, reporting in a four-part series on the Israeli spy ring before, without explanation, Fox News erased the story from their web site and have never mentioned it again, including an admission by a US Official that hard evidence existed linking the events of 9/11 not to Arab Muslims, but to some of the more than 200 Israeli spies arrested both before and after 9/11, but that this evidence had been classified. Then there are the statements by Netanyahu; the airport security firms and P-Tech as well as the Mossad-Israeli Connection and all the other missing links. And what of the Mossad agents that lived next to the alleged hijackers? The fact that Israeli companies were in charge of all four airport security systems deserves much more scrutiny; when was the last time an Israeli air liner was hijacked?
Whistle-blowers: Firefighter, police officers, and first-responders in New York City are beginning to get their stories out. Sick and dying from the poisonous atmosphere that Environmental Protection Agency Secretary Christine Todd Whitman and then-National Security Director Condoleeza Rice declared was "safe to breathe," most rescue workers and personnel now believe 9/11 was an inside job. Days after the 9/11 attacks, firefighters continued to describe explosions and the characteristics of controlled demolitions until their superiors told them to cease and desist discussing 9/11.
Next is a Boston air traffic controller, Robin Hordon, who claims 9/11 was an inside job, and that controllers have been threatened to maintain their silence. He claims that the failure of Standard Operating Procedures that day were unprecedented and abnormal, and that the FAA was not asleep at the wheel. He claims that every FAA center from coast-to-coast, the Pentagon, and the President knew of the hijackings as soon as the first plane was confirmed off-course at 8:24 am. All hijacked aircraft were tracked and known about, and Hordon notes the strange fact that none of the black-box flight recorders and FAA tapes have been analyzed. The government can find a black box at the bottom of the sea (TWA 800), but can't find the 9/11 recorders? And the FAA tapes were actually destroyed by supervisors perpetuating the cover-up, because studies would have exposed who was really behind the attack. Hordon noted that what investigators did was "cherry pick transmissions, communications, and statements that were able to paint and write a story that the public would look at and say, "ooh, wow," this really happened-- but it wasn't factual, it was a story and it tells not anything other than what the high perps wanted the public to hear-- they cherry-picked this information." Hordon says that only if the testimony of dozens of flight controllers currently silenced would come out could the true story about who carried out 9/11 emerge.
Then there is the stunning and sobering testimony of Sergeant Lauro Chavez (in a letter to the Cincinnati Post):
"Greetings Mr. White,
I felt it necessary to follow up to a recent story that was published in Cincinnati Post. It was the 1 in 3 believe 9-11 conspiracy theory. I must admit that at first I was overwhelmed with joy that our local paper was actually starting to have real journalism and talk about real issues. Then I read the story and it was a total debunk to make the actual people around the world who feel there was something not right about 9-11, to look like over reacting conspiracy theorists.
Im utterly outraged. My 9 year old daughter could have done more research in this, as opposed to just trying to throw the publics ideas and feelings out. Is this not what journalism is supposed to represent - real issues? There have been many, many polls done in major cities that actually ask people how they felt about the 9-11 tragedy. One such poll is called the Zogby poll; which was offered in New York City.
Honestly I could care less what is done with this letter, but I feel that I should speak my mind and Ill tell you some things that I have not told many people at all. From 1995 till 2002 I was a Sergeant in the United States Army. Not only this, but I was stationed at United States Central Command, which is located at MacDill AFB in Tampa Florida. I was on active duty when 9-11 happened. In the days prior to the tragedies, we were involved in many exercises. Some of these exercises included the scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into, our building the world trade center, the White House, Sears Tower, and the Pentagon. These drills or exercises as we called them, where classified Top Secret. Having a Top Secret rated clearance I was dumbfounded that they would ever push a training exercise above the level of Secret. Over my 8 years in the Army, I had participated in many exercises around the world, none of which were ever classified over the Secret level.
Ill start by saying a few months prior it was announced by President Bush that Dick Cheney would be heading up operations over NORAD our North American Aerospace Defense Command. Along with many of my peers, we were shocked. Over the years, if you research NORAD, it has always been under the command of a Military officer. It was done this way because the defense of this country has always been in the hands of such. Prior to the months before 9-11 this was all of the sudden changed. Like I said, if you research NORAD and the command structure you will find that it was imposed long ago that the military should be in control of the order to scramble planes in the defense of American air space. For some strange reason, Bush changed this and gave that power to a civilian person on his Staff team yes I know, very interesting.
Back to the morning of 9-11; the command was busy with this training exercise. We were instructed to bring all our gear in to prep for a mock (staged) deployment to the Middle East. On the morning of 9-11 I had been on base prepped and ready to go since about 0400am. During my time at the base that morning, they were setting up barriers around the command and placing gun posts on the roofs. When I questioned one of the security officers about the machine gun and shoulder fired rockets on the roof I was given the answer its a precaution for a plane attempting to crash into this building.
So, I was standing in the SCIF (Secure Compartmented Information Facility), which is basically this underground bunker command post for USCENTCOM, when the first plane hit. We were watching the fly patterns of all the planes on the aerospace grid. This contained not only all commercial flights at the time, but all military flights, and fake enemy planes that were supposedly put on there for the exercise. Many of the planes sent to intercept the fake blips were scrambled from Andrews which is an air defense AFB for the East Coast. They were sent across the US and left very few planes to defend the capital. After the first plane hit the tower we were all in disbelief. After the initial shock was over, our questions were what are the odds this could happen for real, during a training exercise thats covering the same scenario? We were all at wits end. Then to top all of this off, Cheney gave NORAD the order to stand down scrambling jets to intercept. A few moments later tower 2 was hit. Only after the Pentagon was hit, did he give the orders to scramble the jets to intercept the plane bound for the White House.
All of this is very interesting to me it sickened me so that I left the Army after coming back from an 8 month deployment to Afghanistan. There were just too many questions that no one could answer, too many things that did not make sense. How is it possible to have a training exercise about planes hitting the WTC and then actually have planes hit the WTC? This kind of thing just does not happen unless its pre-planned. What reason would there be to have this type of exercise on that morning, Ill tell you if you are placing fake planes all over the north American aerospace grid then you have no way of knowing which planes are real and which are fake. Then to thicken the plot you put a civilian in charge of NORAD so that the military does not have the power to initiate the order for jets to be scrambled to intercept. If the military would have still commanded power over NORAD they would have scrambled jets because they would have simply followed the procedures that had been in place for this type of situation for years and years and scrambled jets.
To delve even further, as I'm standing there watching the towers collapse, next to me is one of my good friends and a former commander of the Army Corps of Engineers. He is a demolitions expert. He was even more surprised than me. When the towers collapsed he kept saying this isn't right, this isn't right. When I asked him what he was talking about he told me that steel buildings don't fall down that way. Even if they are struck by objects; he went on to say that in theory if the top 10 floors were hit, then possibly just that part of the building would fall over and off, but the rest would remain standing. When I asked him, not understanding the implications of demolitions, he told me that it looked as if they were brought down by controlled demolitions. I was utterly amazed, but after he said that it did sort of appear that way.
Ill tell you what gave this whole thing away was building 7. If they would not have brought this building down, then they probably could have gotten away with it all. It was the most amazing site I have ever seen. Not only was it amazing, it bore reality to the truth of the situation something was not right here. Now, I'm going to tell you all I have learned, but I urge anyone to just spend 1hr reading about this incident on the internet and learning the facts. There have been numerous scholars, numerous physicists that have analyzed this over and over and over again. And they all come to the same conclusion, something does not add up. Building 7 was never directly hit by a plane. Now it was stated that a piece of one of the towers fell onto the side of building 7 and caught one of the floors on fire. A few moments later we all witnessed the most perfect example of controlled demolitions to ever be caught on camera. It could not be proved that building 7 fell due to fire. My friend and I standing there in the SCIF watching in uninterrupted awe with all those other military members; watching building 7 fall perfectly onto its footprint; my friend stating that it was beautifully done.
We all knew then we all realized that this was not some group of unorganized cave dwellers from Afghanistan orchestrating a perfect hit on American soil. It was impossible. Shortly after the Pentagon was struck I called my close friend that I went to Basic Training with. All civilian lines were down and I had to contact him via STU which is a black line classified phone system. He did not answer, but one of his soldiers did. I asked if SGT Worthington was ok and he said yes. I asked if the plane did severe damage and he told me I didn't see any plane. Then when I finally got to speak to my friend, he started acting strange saying he could not talk about the incident over this line. He was shipped off overseas a few weeks later and I never to this day have had the chance to speak with him.
The Pentagon crash tape was released a few months back after 5 years. You need to watch that tape no where can you see a plane strike the Pentagon. This is because it was not a plane. I cannot tell you exactly what hit the Pentagon, but its unanimous; it was definitely not a plane. I can assure you that there is more than one CCTV camera around the Pentagon. On September 25, 4 days before my 25th birthday, I deployed to Afghanistan. Over the 8months I was there I had never seen one intelligent Afghani soldier. They were all tattered and scrawny and could barely shoot their weapons straight. This does not mean that there were not men that could fly a plane, but after what I saw it was extremely hard to believe they could be taught to fly a sophisticated piece of aeronautical equipment.
My point Mr. Editor is that I spent 8 months in combat watching my brothers die in the name of Freedom. I killed, in the name of Freedom and to this day my brothers are still being killed for this illusionary war we call the War on Terror. Where the enemy has no face where there is no clear objective. In this War, anyone with ill thoughts toward this country can be defined as a terrorist. Well, I guess that includes me in this group as well as everyone else who questions the events of 911, because we all hold ill thoughts toward the leadership of this country and I say the real terrorists in this world sit right in the heart of its capital.
I have bled for this country and would do so again in a heart beat but only to protect its people, the true Americans that live here. I would never again offer my life under the leadership whose real goal is oil and money. The same ones who staged the most perfect illusionary tactic in our history that was a pretext to a war on terror that would never again go away. Their goal was to scare the American public into submission making it easier for the world powers to do their evil and get away with it.
Now that may sound like a typical conspiracy theorist I guess, but how many do you actually talk to? I'm not here saying that Aliens came down and used laser beams to bring the towers down or control the planes that were flown; Im telling you as a sane, logical and intelligent individual, something does not add up about this. Earlier this year I was watching the Discovery channel. They have a PBS program called Rebuilding America. This particular episode was about the WTC building 7. They interviewed Larry Silverstein (the owner) about building 7. He stated on national TV the following which is the direct quote and can be found here: http://www.wtc7.net/pullit.html
I remember getting a call from the, ER, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
I actually have the program recorded and you are more than welcome to come by my house and watch it. He actually stated this on national TV. I was so amazed that I almost shat myself. I could not believe he actually stated this on a nationally broadcasted TV program. You can ask any person who has done controlled demolitions please interview someone they will tell you it takes weeks of planning to do this. We are expected to believe that this was facilitated and planned in a matter of hours for building 7, while the damn thing was on fire you have got to be kidding me. If that is not enough to make you believe something was fishy well then nothing will ever do.
Since that time there have been numerous scholars, some of which have actually been publicly broadcast on CSPAN. The latest program was called: Theories about 9-11. American Perspectives and you can watch this (which I advise you do) per this link: Theories about 9-11 (American Perspectives) or you can go to www.c-span.org and look under their video/audio section to find this title. Its an outstanding video and encompasses the thoughts of not only the American public, but also Dr Steven Jones from Brigham Young University a physics professor that actually received a piece of the rubble from the WTC. Not only does he profoundly agree that building 7 was a controlled demolition he can prove it. After he analyzed the piece of debris they found; there were large traces of sulfur and Thermite found. If you did not know, Thermite is a chemical compound found in many explosives including C4 which I have used many times in the Army. It leaves a distinct smell and identifiable residue upon explosion. Dr Jones found large traces of this from the rubble.
Sir, there are many things that I never wanted to know for one that the government that is supposed to be caring for the American people could be corrupt. This was the last thing that I ever wanted to be true but its time we wake up and smell the bullshit because its permeating throughout the American public and we are all starting to realize whats really going on. If your news station actually did a similar Zogby type poll here in Cincinnati, I think you would find that a lot more than 1/3 of the people believe this. I know tons just in this area.
I could literally write you 100 pages of truths that could prove that 9-11 was an inside job, but Id probably just be passed off as some crazy conspiracy theorist. Instead I want to give you the tools to look for yourself because the quest for wisdom is a journey we must all take alone. So, to you I add the following links and if you just spend a small portion of your day reading and watching some of this footage, who knows you may wake up and stand along side the rest of us
in utter amazement.
SGT Lauro Chavez
United States Central Command
Thanks to the Internet, one of the few freedoms we have left, these truths can be sent to the public. Thank God we don't have to rely on news media to get this information out to everyone!"
In determining who is responsible for the atrocities on 9/11, one must asks who really gained? Whose political agenda was advanced? Framed that way, the answer is clear: The neo-cons who drew up the 1992 Defense Planning Guidance, the members of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the authors of "A Clean Break: Securing the Realm," a policy paper written for Israel's Likud government in 1997, and the authors of a 1998 letter to President Clinton urging regime change in Iraq.
However, the most damning document is PNAC's 2000 "Rebuilding America's Defenses." The paper calls for a unipolar world with the US not allowing any perceived challenge to its global hegemony, and for the transformation of the American military, a slow-moving process "absent a catastrophic and catalyzing event... like a New Pearl Harbor."
One year later, that event arrived!
Then again, perhaps I am just a crazy conspiracy theorist.
According to the once-revered Noam Chomsky, the identity of the culprits who murdered nearly 3,000 people to advance their global agenda is unimportant: "Who cares? What does it matter even if it was true, it wouldn't be significant?" He refers to the Kennedy assassination and insists the assassin was Oswald, with the nonsensical comment that "Who killed John F. Kennedy? Who cares? People get killed all the time."
Add to this his routine dismissal of the role of the Jewish lobby in shaping US Middle East policy and it is easy to understand why he is known as the "Chief Gatekeeper," as he calls the evidence we have produced worthless (while he does not deign to even consider the evidence, dismissing it out of hand) and totally disrespects us with an almost unbelievably pompous arrogance.
I would like to give thanks and salutations to professors David Ray Griffin, James Fetzer, and Steven Jones; authors Michael Ruppert, Webster Tarpley, Paul Craig Roberts, Jim Marrs, Barry Zwicker, Rowland Morgan, and Ian Henshall; philanthropist Jimmy Walter; author and filmmaker Eric Hufschmid (Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack and Painful Deceptions); Colonel Robert Bowman; scientist Kevin Ryan; actor Charlie Sheen; filmmakers Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas; author and filmmaker Alex Jones (infowars.com and prisonplanet.com); webmaster Mike Rivero (of www.whatreallyhappened.com); and the countless legions of independent journalists and bloggers that I failed to mention and who know the truth.
9/11 Truth Debate:
For the record, I will not be drawn into the false Globalists vs. Zionists controversy. That controversy is designed to destroy the 9/11 truth movement. The fact is, there are some Globalists who are not Zionists, there are some Zionists who are not Globalists, and there are Globalists who are Zionists. Whatever the power configuration, that does not absolve the rulers of the United States government for their involvement in the criminal events of 9/11, nor does it absolve the dual-national Israeli traitors that are staffing the key agencies and positions that allow the treason of 9/11 to continue and the perpetrators to commit more crimes. Nor does the search for truth and justice end with the departure of these criminals from office. There is no statute of limitations on war crimes and mass-murder.